6 out of 7 people found the following comment useful.
A brilliant and outragously funny satire of society, 7 December 1999
Author: Dave Joerg ([email protected])
"Flodder" is one of the funniest movies ever made and few people realise that it is a Dutch movie made by none other than the Holland version of John Carpenter, the famous Dick Maas, author and director of the thriller "Amsterdamned". The Flodder family is the reincarnation of the term a-social. When the whole family bunch, basically all bastards, criminals and sluts must be relocated from their City slum because of toxic waste under their house, the city council house no choice. The only available space is in the "Zoendal" - the "Sun Valley" the best area in Amsterdam where all doctors, snobs and businessmen can afford to live their lives. And where the central point of interest and politics is the tennis club of the community. The Flodder family brings devastation to the tranquil world that ruled before. They are simply unbelievable. The characterisation is incredibly funny, beginning with Ma Flodder who searches other people's trash cans for food or making illegal liquor in her cellar and ending with the eldest daughter who is the biggest slut on earth. Together they make the most horrible family imaginable, a sort of immoral mirror image to the Brady Bunch or the Waltons. When the City counsel of Amsterdam hoped that the Flodders would show their good will to be more civilised in their new area, it turns out that Holland's most famous family would rather bring out the worst in the rich people of "Sun Valley"-wonderland. The rest is a hilarious, brilliant and well made social satire that can be watched as a provocative movie as well as a straightforward comedy. Dick Maas at his best. I salute him! Flooder was the Dutch smash hit in 1986 and brought two sequels and a tv series. All of the sequels were nice but not as great as the original.
Flodders (1986) is available on DVD in Germany in a dubbed German version in Dolby Digital 5.1. under the name:
"Flodders -Eine Familie zum knutschen"
Why is First Floor Features, the producer of the movie not bringing the Dick Maas blockbusters out on DVD in the Netherlands, I wonder. The are not even available on video there. These movies have so much potential, still to this day and have a huge silent but true following.
在时代的洪流里，一个不合时宜的理想青年的宿命。经济萧条失业，好友死于玩笑，恋人永远等不到他了。结尾如鲠在喉，他什么都留不下来，好难过又好无力。可是就算活下来，难保《我们的父辈》不会重演，毕竟都是希林。PS：《巴比伦柏林》第四季到底啥时候上
不太同意所谓「断层」的说法，前半段极现代的镜头语言用以完成对于现代性的批判，Found Footage的调用引导视点自由穿梭在历史的迷雾当中。后半段未曾颠覆铺设好的情绪，人物以现代的身份为前现代的羁绊招魂——生存、爱恋与自我认同，因而叙事也最终复归传统，以图呼应内心隐秘的稚拙。
那些个柱我站在上帝视角觉得他们对弥豆子好惨忍。但弥豆子是鬼啊，也理解他们
看到结局心脏骤停。迷乱、不安、躁动、未知，历史的点滴体现在日常生活里。
1.开始的长镜头在地铁站内，一出地铁站立马从当代“穿越”到了1931年，且胶片的质感非常有感觉
除了太长没什么毛病！实在是太爱Tom Schilling了！
日本动画，动作片，奇幻 挺好看的，有趣挺推荐的
柱全部出场，下弦鬼除了下弦一以外全部殒命。这才对嘛，不然以这个节奏的话不知道要拖到什么时候。
人物传记史/时代悲歌，游移长镜头，道德秩序毁灭，死在家乡阳光明媚的河底，烧毁书籍-个人记忆被历史磨灭，保持清醒/怀有希望即不合时宜（法文跟1号厅一样热
《法比安》就像是克拉考尔社会学著作的电影版本，混乱的熵增导向疯狂的张力，事件变为即将到来之物。导演通过介于历史先锋主义以及Dogma95的主观视角祛除了有失真实的史诗光环，还原为一种正在经历的激进“此在”。《法》不是政治史，而是精神史，在高度分裂的影像碎片之中，影片的开场却以一个历史时间的长镜头宣告了巴赞摄影现实主义的终结，又在动线上与结尾的“下降”相对——作为对幻觉机制的进入和退出
“你是怎么陷入这个地狱的？”——通过表演。最后的跳水是自杀秀，是对某种根源于自然的灾难性隐喻：死亡是必然，活着才是侥幸；而从这里，我们每天下午三点都会赴一场缺席之约会：用无实物表演，配合着过曝的舞台上的弥散景观。我们看到，电影的景深在交响乐般的意识下筑起，所有人都不得不在都市里漂移、成为德波口中的情境主义者，在丢失理想和爱被毁灭的城市与年代。
前面一小部分让我想到了一个名词“电影的戏剧化”——才用多视点一定程度上还原了戏院里的观看模式，后面的叙事较为平稳，部分镜头有“私影像”的特性，多次分心。
闪闪发光，虽然被践踏、被毁坏，但是在火焰和水流里，都发出那种真的光芒，那是他们想要消灭却束手无策的，那是最要紧，最值得守护的。
时间确实有点长，且认为叫“一战后的德意志” 或者“二战前的德国”，要开始战争前，社会就是各种动荡和混乱，然后好事份子就出现了。
从《无主之作》到《亚历山大广场》，德国导演似乎很喜欢拍摄这类长篇的电视电影。前半段眼花缭乱的技法活灵活现地勾画出30年代魏玛共和国时期的纸醉金迷氛围，令人赞不绝口。可惜后半段逐渐转向痴男怨女的爱情故事，恢弘的时代感坍缩成一个作家的悲剧，这种情节处理更接近文学作品的展示，在影像上没有太惊艳的突破。
对瞬间地考古，对当下地建构，对权利地解剖，对爱情地颂歌
【4】被混乱无序的氛围所笼罩，穿梭在城市或悲伤之间，你我皆为所处时代的幽灵，但每个人都可以是一部断代史。
“你是怎么陷入这个地狱的？”——通过表演。最后的跳水是自杀秀，是对某种根源于自然的灾难性隐喻：死亡是必然，活着才是侥幸；而从这里，我们每天下午三点都会赴一场缺席之约会：用无实物表演，配合着过曝的舞台上的弥散景观。我们看到，电影的景深在交响乐般的意识下筑起，所有人都不得不在都市里漂移、成为德波口中的情境主义者，在丢失理想和爱被毁灭的城市与年代。
看不得这种揪心的东西
按克拉考尔的理论拍的电影，形式和内容都非常诗性，无序的手持镜头有极强的张力。经济危机之后，魏玛天上大乱的日子与现在相呼应，末日就在眼前了，一个人该如何做呢？本片勾起了我强烈的烟瘾。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
